A study published in Zoo Biology investigated the effects of after-hour events on the behaviour and physiology of zoo-housed cheetahs (x2) and giraffes (x2):
✔Behaviour and fecal glucocorticoid metabolite (fGM) monitored during three conditions: concerts, other events, no events.
✔Higher sound pressure levels during concerts.
✔No significant differences in fGM across conditions
✔Effects on behaviour varied across individuals and species: e.g. during concerts one cheetah showed increased alert and stereotypic behaviour, and one giraffe showed an increased in social interactions.
✔Impact of after-hour events can vary within species and individual welfare monitoring is recommended.

A case study published in Zoo Biology assessed the effect of a visual barrier removal on the behaviour of two zoo-housed Bald Eagles:
✔Before visual barrier (two large doors) was removed, the two eagles could not see approaching zoo visitors.
✔After visual barrier removal: more even use of enclosure (both birds), reduction in gular fluttering/panting and increased resting (one bird).
✔As eagles have acute vision, improving visual access to their surroundings while in human care may have a positive impact on their behaviour and welfare.

The welfare of two zoo-housed fossas was assessed via behavioural observations and hormonal profiling, in a study published in Zoo Biology:
✔When male entered female enclosure: male exhibited lower fecal cortisol metabolites (FCM), and an increase in exploratory and marking behaviours (enriching effect?)...
✔In same period, female showed higher FCM (stress from socialisation?).
✔When the fossas were in their respective (adjacent) outdoor enclosures: higher FCM in female, increased pacing in male (stress? frustration?).
✔Female in indoor enclosure showed lower activity and abnormal behaviours, potentially due to less complex environment but complete separation from male and visitors.
✔The complexity of the environment and socialisation have a potential impact on the welfare of zoo-housed fossas - applications to husbandry and management.

Out of sight, out of mind? A case study in Zoo Biology assessed the incidence of stereotypic behaviours in a pair of zoo-housed tigers in three conditions (housed together, housed separately with visual contact, housed separately with visual barrier):

✔Pacing was significantly higher when separated tigers had visual contact.

✔Visual barriers effectively mitigated pacing in tigers housed separately.

✔Applications to ex situ management of tigers and other felids.

How can we measure chronic stress in zoo-housed giraffes? According to a paper in JZBG, the allostatic load (i.e. cumulative effects of chronic stress on health) of zoo-housed giraffes can be measured with a panel of biomarkers:

✔Biomarkers selected: Body condition score, cortisol, DHEA-S, cholesterol, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), and fructosamine.

✔Inconsistent correlations of individual biomarkers with stress events.

✔Allostatic load index, determined with a panel of the selected biomarkers, robustly reflected total stress events.

✔Allostatic load index may be an effective tool for accurate chronic stress measurements in zoo-housed giraffes.

Identifying key animal care needs for zoo-housed species is vital to ensure their welfare... A new paper in JZBG discussed how to identify those needs and use them to set up a foundation for welfare assessments:
✔ Evidence-based approach to "welfare-focussed" husbandry.
✔ Consider the morphology, physiology & behaviour the species evolved in their natural environment.
✔ Measure the behaviours animals are motivated to engage in & what are the welfare implications of not being able to engage in them.
✔ The approach used in this example with giraffes can be replicated across species.

Do male presence, enclosure size and temperature affect stress responses (fecal glucocorticoid metabolite (fGCM) levels) and social behaviour in zoo-housed female giraffes? A study in Zoo Biology investigated:
✔ fGCM levels were not significantly altered when the male was present, but agonistic interactions between females increased.
✔ Agonistic interactions between females were more frequent in small enclosure.
✔ Low temperatures: higher fGCM levels and increased agonistic interactions in an aged female.
✔ Multiple factors seemed to affect stress responses of giraffes: applications to ex situ management.

How do zookeepers in North America perceive felid welfare? A paper in Zoo Biology investigated:
✔ 121 zookeepers from AZA-accredited zoos were surveyed.
✔Zookeeper perceptions of animal welfare are influenced by opportunities for professional development offered by the institutions.
✔Participants recommended improvements in the enclosures, behavioural husbandry, diet presentation & opportunities to retreat from the visitors.
✔ Differences in perceptions of welfare for small and large cat species.

Can access to multiple habitats improve behaviour and welfare in zoo-housed black bears? A case study in JZBG investigated:
✔ Full access to multiple habitats decreased likelihood of pacing and increased likelihood of foraging in two black bears.
✔ Visibility of the animals decreased for one bear but not the other.
✔ Results suggest a positive effect of access to multiple areas on welfare.

A research published in JZBG looked into the potential effects of background colour (i.e. green, grey, black, transparent) on the behaviour of captive Lake Oku clawed frogs:
✔ Initial stress response to changes in background, which disappeared after five days.
✔ Different background colours did not differently affect stress behaviour, BUT...
✔ Green & grey backgrounds elicited the weakest stress response to background change.
✔ Applications to zoo management & husbandry.

A study published in the JZBG investigated the potential effects of an evening event on the behaviour of zoo-housed giraffes, capybaras, tapirs and vicugnas:
✔ Capybara spent more time out of sight before rather than during or after event (only significant difference observed).
✔ No substantial negative effects of the event detected.
✔ Free access to indoor & outdoor areas (all but giraffe) may have helped animals coping with event.

How does a more complex exhibit (two enclosures connected by trail system) affect the behaviour of zoo-housed tigers? A new paper in Zoo Biology investigated:
✔ Increase in activity & exploratory behaviours.
✔ Decrease in inactivity and pacing.
✔ Nocturnal activity also increased in more complex enclosure.
✔ Higher nocturnal movement between 6 and 10 pm, showing similar patterns with their wild counterparts.
✔ Voluntary access to larger and more complex enclosures improves behaviour & welfare in captive tigers.

The nocturnal behaviour of zoo-housed lesser flamingos was investigated in a paper in JZBG:
✔ Higher proportions of active birds at dusk than in the morning.
✔ Diverse enclosure use, with outdoor & indoor areas used by different birds at different times of the day.
✔ Potential changing needs for flamingos housed indoors overnight and those with access to an outdoor area at night time. 
✔ Behavioural monitoring over 24-h period is an important step to understand the welfare and needs of captive birds.

A case study in Zoo Biology looked into the pacing behaviour of a zoo-housed polar bear:
✔Most of pacing observations occurred when door to shift animal off-exhibit was opened.
✔Positive reinforcement-based training applied to modify behaviour.
✔Pacing bout duration decreased significantly.
✔Pacing was inadvertently reinforced by routine rather than poor welfare.

The behaviour of three zoo-housed testudine species (radiated, leopard & Aldabra tortoises) was monitored before & after changes in their environment, in a study published in JZBG:
✔ Changes included increase in enclosure size, addition of substrate material & change in handling procedure.
✔ No significant changes in Shannon–Weiner diversity index, but numerical increases observed.
✔ Leopard tortoises experienced greater changes in the environment AND responded with greater changes in the behaviour.
✔ Increase in aggression observed (potential negative effect).
✔ Impact of changes on welfare is inconclusive but some evidence of an increase in behavioural diversity.

A study in Applied Animal Behaviour Science looked into self-directed behaviours (potential stress indicator) of semi-captive African elephants during five levels of tourist interactions (none, feed, touch, walk, ride):
✔Self-directed behaviours increased during walks and rides, BUT⤵
✔Decreased during touch & were unaffected by feeds - control & ability to move away in these interactions were positive to welfare;
✔No correlation between self-directed behaviours & faecal glucocorticoid metabolites - low-level stress that does not activate GC production?
✔Lower incidence of self-directed behaviours in high tourist numbers - due to higher food amounts?

A paper in JZBG validated a welfare assessment tool for an understudied species, the common cusimanse:
✔The Animal Welfare Assessment Grid (AWAG) was adapted;

✔As published literature was limited, zoo records & captive behavioural observations were needed to complement information;
✔21 welfare factors identified;
✔Tool validated by assessing welfare of four zoo-housed cusimanses;
✔Applications to other understudied species.

A paper in the American Journal of Primatology investigated whether five zoo-housed primate species retreated with an increase in visitor numbers:
✔Allen's swamp monkeys, eastern black-and-white colobus monkeys, Bolivian gray titi monkeys, DeBrazza's monkeys & crowned lemurs;
✔Animals did not retreat as visitor numbers increased;
✔Small but statistically significant decrease in distance with increasing visitor numbers;
✔Behavioural welfare indicators unaffected by number of visitors;
✔Proximity to visitors may be a useful indicator for welfare assessments.

Does the presence or absence of visitors have an effect on captive chimpanzee wounding? A study in JZBG looked into it:
✔ 21 chimpanzees across 3 zoos;
✔ Frequency of "no wound" events compared in the presence and total absence of visitors;
✔ Frequencies were similar across conditions, suggesting presence of visitors did not influence wounding behaviour.

How do zoo visitors perceive reptile & amphibian welfare? A study in JZAR looked into it:
✔ Perceptions of herptile welfare influenced by comfort level with animal,  its perceived likeability & previous experiences with the animal;
✔ Number of annual visits to the zoo can also influence perceptions;
✔ Visitors ranked size of enclosure lower than other welfare objectives - preference for larger enclosures?
✔ Visitors perceive zoos are meeting physical needs of herptiles but can improve in meeting their affective needs.

The space use of five captive elasmobranch species was evaluated in a new study in JZBG:
✔ Enclosure divided in five sections: Exhibit use (X-Y axis) and Depth use (Z axis);
✔ Despite differences between individuals, Exhibit use was relatively even, while Depth use was uneven.
✔ Results as expected according to each species' natural history, except for the smooth dogfish, which required further interventions;
✔ Space use can be a valuable tool in animal welfare assessments.

The behaviour of two zoo-housed pairs of red pandas was studied in a paper published in JZBG...
✔No abnormal behaviours reported; 
✔Time budgets similar to those reported for the species;
✔Resting, comfort & vigilance behaviours most frequent;
✔Behavioural Variety Index (BVI) showed each animal performed approximately 73% of behaviours described for the species.
✔BVI may be a useful tool for animal welfare assessments & behavioural studies.

A review on bird welfare in zoos and aquariums has been published in JZBG:

✔ Bird welfare research can be informed by research from other industries;
✔ More research on a wider range of bird species & research topics recommended.

In a study in JZBG, the behaviour of zoo-housed Mexican red kneed spiders was monitored in the 24 hours after handling for education sessions:
✔ Time spent under-cover & in limb-interaction behaviour higher on handling days;

✔ Handling significantly affected behaviour - more research needed to determine welfare implications;
✔ Protocols for the handling of invertebrates in education sessions should be developed and/or refined.

A comparison of social behaviours between free-living and captive American alligators was published in JZBG:
✔Frequency of social behaviours was much higher in the wild congregation;
✔Wild congregation also showed a richer social behavioural repertoire;
✔"High walking" - a non-social behaviour & potential stereotypy - was most frequent in the captive congregation;  
✔"Flushing" was used as a defense reaction to human disturbance in both congregations.

An investigation into lying rest behaviour of zoo-housed elephants was published in Zoo Biology:
✔ Longer lying durations in elephants housed on soft substrates;
✔ Dominance status also affected lying rest;
✔ Higher frequency of side changes between lying bouts on soft substrates;
✔ Soft substrates & healthy social environments seem to improve lying rest behaviours & welfare.

A recent study, published in Zoo Biology, compared animal welfare conceptions between animal caretakers, visitors & veterinary staff:
✔ Strong correlation between the animal carers' holistic welfare assessments & the visitor perceptions of animal happiness;
✔ These assessments did, however, inversely correlate with the assessments by the veterinary staff;
✔ Visitor perceptions of animal happiness strongly correlated with their enjoyment of zoo visits; 
✔ Clarification of animal welfare concepts among zoo staff is recommended;
✔ Improving animal welfare also benefits the visitor experience & therefore the zoo's commercial aims.

The effects of social housing on the stereotypical behaviour of bull Asian elephants were investigated in a study published in JZBG:

✔ Decrease in stereotypies (both pacing & head bobbing) when housed with at least other elephant;

✔ Decrease in stereotypies as affiliative behaviours increased while agonistic behaviour had no effect;

✔ Pacing was higher when lone bulls were in musth;

✔ Social housing may improve welfare of bull Asian elephants in captivity.

A preliminary study published in Zoo Biology investigated if and how several zoo animals were impacted by a concert:
✔Some species showed behavioural changes correlated with the event (mostly associated with active & resting behaviours);
✔No behavioural changes detected in several species;
✔Differences between species highlights need to monitor behaviour during events & to consider each species natural biology when trying to mitigate their effects;

A paper in JZBG compared enclosure use in zoo-housed flamingos using data collected at group- and individual-level:

✔Overall preferred zone occupancy was similar between methods;

✔Individual data showed wider use of enclosure than group data;

✔Individual data suggested zone underuse, while group data suggested zone overuse;

✔Both methods should be used for more accurate assessments of enclosure use and welfare.

A paper in Zoo Biology looked into the potential effects of Denver Zoo's "Zoo Lights" evening event on the behaviour and welfare of the great Indian hornbills in their care:

✔No significant increase in aggressive behaviour during or after the event;

✔Affiliative behaviours increased, but likely because it coincided with breeding season and not because of the event;

✔Applications to zoo management.

A study in JZAR evaluated a gorilla welfare assessment tool based on keeper ratings:

✔Welfare of two groups of zoo-housed gorillas monitored daily for three months (keeper ratings and behavioural observations)

✔Keepers detected more subtle changes in welfare than researchers in previous studies;

✔Despite good inter-rater reliability, keeper scores did not always match behavioural observations - more training, staff meetings & longer observations recommended.

A paper in JZAR described the physiological (faecal glucocorticoid metabolites - FGMs) & behavioural responses of two zoo-housed giraffes to construction work:
✔Higher FGMs in both giraffes during initial demolition phase;
✔One individual also showed higher FGMs, decreased inactivity and increased stereotypies during active construction phase,
✔One of the giraffes became ill and was euthanised, which caused changes in the behaviour & physiology of the other one;
✔Construction work and loss of social partner were sources of stress - applications to giraffe management.

A paper in JZBG investigated behaviour & habitat use in zoo-housed bears over multi-year periods:

✔2 zoos, 5 species, 9 individuals;

✔Activity budgets diverse & dynamic over time (more so in younger individuals);

✔Habitat use decreased over time;

✔Changes in behaviour associated with decreased welfare likely related with age or seasonality rather than habitat;

✔Changes associated with positive welfare observed - frequent daily variation in behaviour & rare stereotypies;

A paper in Zoo Biology investigated regurgitation & reingestion (R/R) and coprophagy behaviours in the gorilla North American (captive) population:
✔Survey competed by all AZA-accredited institutions with gorillas in their collection;
✔60% of population engages in R/R to some degree;
✔24% engages in coprophagy on a weekly basis;
✔Future research should focus on identifying drivers of these behaviours, so evidence-based actions can be taken to mitigate them.

A study in Zoo Biology investigated differences in the behaviour of ♂ Japanese macaques in a vegetated and in a non-vegetated enclosure:

✔Vegetated: Better coat conditions, more social play and feeding-related behaviours, less resting;

✔Non-vegetated: More stereotypic behaviours & agonistic interactions;

✔Findings suggest better welfare in vegetated enclosure, highlighting importance of recreating some features of natural habitat.

A new paper in Applied Animal Behaviour Science investigated the impact of enclosure size on corn snake behaviour and welfare:

✔Snakes more active in a large enclosure (longer than snake length) than in a small enclosure (2/3 of snake length);

✔Snakes stretched out in the large enclosure, spending almost 20% of resting time in this position (no opportunity for this behaviour in small enclosure);

✔"Loosely coiled" posture significantly higher in large enclosure;

✔Preference tests: active snakes preferred large enclosure;

✔Enclosure longer than snake length is recommended to improve behaviour and welfare of captive corn snakes.

----------

Photo: Exmor Zoo

A study in JZBG investigated the behavioural responses of two captive female African elephants to temporary separation from other two herd members as they were being transported to other zoo:

✔Elephants travelled to the other zoo in two pairs: a mother-daughter pair & and an unrelated but bonded pair of females (short gap between transports);

✔The mother-daughter pair showed an increase in human-audible vocalisations, temporal gland secretions & decrease in play behaviour when the other pair left ahead of them;

✔Despite being mostly unrelated, the group showed similar signs of stress as expected if the group was highly related;

✔Applications to elephant management.

Last week we shared the news that the results of the largest-ever captive cetacean welfare study were out... Here is an overview of their findings, published in Plos One:

✔Four species: Common & Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins, beluga whale & Pacific white-sided dolphin;

✔Data collected at 43 institutions between 2018 and 2019;

✔Reference values established for blood variables and fecal hormone metabolites available in app ZooPhysioTrak;

✔Enrichment & social management showed higher impact on welfare than habitat characteristics;

✔Applications to cetacean management & welfare in captivity.

A study in JZAR discussed the impact of two interventions (relocation to a less dynamic pool & individualised feeding & conditioning method) on the behaviour of a captive female smooth dogfish:

✔Reduction of stereotypic behaviours after interventions;

✔Increase in species-specific & resting behaviours;

✔Increase in enclosure use;

✔Small sample size & more research recommended but interesting findings with applications to fish management & welfare.

New study in JZBG surveyed the global zoo husbandry practices for the fossa:

✔All animals receive enrichment & most have at least an area away from visitors but majority express unnatural behaviours;

✔Unnatural behaviour may be reduced with dense cover, restricted public viewing areas, variable feeding schedule & reduced view of other species;

✔41% of surveyed "breeding individuals" have bred at the zoo;

✔Important applications to fossa husbandry & welfare.

A study in Zoo Biology investigated the impacts of human-dolphin interactions on both bottlenose dolphins and the visitors:

✔Human participants reported a sense of attachment to the animals after interaction -applications to conservation education?

✔Dolphins showed no significant changes in behaviour - neutral effect on their welfare?

✔Small sample size - further research required.

A new paper in JZBG investigated the applications of DNA damage as an indicator of animal welfare in three zoo-housed grizzly bears:

✔DNA damage significantly increased with adrenal activity (faecal glucocorticoid metabolites);

✔Relationship between DNA damage and social affiliative behaviours varied between individuals;

✔Potential for DNA damage to be used in animal welfare assessments, but further research & validation required.

--------

Photo credit: Detroit Zoo

A study in JZAR looked into behaviour & locomotion of the Asian elephants at Dublin Zoo, using CCTV footage:

✔Mean daily distance travelled (9.35 km/day) comparable to wild individuals (5-10 km/day);

✔50% of time spent foraging & 18% spent moving;

✔Locomotion & behaviour in these elephants closer to wild than previous zoo studies;

✔CCTV footage offers opportunities for behavioural research.

--------

Photo credit: Dublin Zoo

A study in in JZBG looked into social relationships and maternal care in zoo-housed bottlenose dolphins:

✔Affiliative behaviours were dominant;

✔Strong mother-calf associations through 2nd and 3rd years of life;

✔Some individuals kept preferred associations, while others changed;

✔No large reductions in associations observed - strong relationships between individuals.

A study in JZBG described the application of an acoustic monitoring system for captive bottlenose dolphins:

✔Software automatically compares acoustic behaviour of dolphins with past records;

✔Changes in acoustic behaviour can be detected - health & welfare problems?

✔Can help identifying problematic acoustic sources for the dolphins;

✔Applications to welfare monitoring of dolphins in zoos & aquariums.

How does rearing environment affect the behaviour of captive Chilean flamingos? A new study in JZBG compared foster-reared and parent-reared chicks:

✔Foster-reared chicks: less time feeding, fewer preferred associations and more likely to occupy nesting area;

✔Social bonds were equally strong and durable in both foster-reared & parent-reared chicks;

✔Cross-fostering has limited impacts on behavioural and social development.

A study in JZBG looked into visitor effects on zoo-housed Nile crocodiles:

✔Behaviour was significantly affected by time of day, temperature & month;

✔Visitor effects on behaviour were found to be small/neutral.

✔Environmental variables should be considered when assessing behaviour and welfare in zoo-housed reptiles.

----------

Photo credit: David R. Tribble (Nile crocodiles at Disney's Animal Kingdom).

A paper in Applied Animal Behaviour Science investigated whether questionnaires can be used to reliably assess and monitor the welfare of captive killer whales:

✔Results validated questionnaires as an accurate welfare assessment tool for captive orcas;

✔High correlation between personality, welfare & subjective well-being;

✔Findings were similar to previous research on primates.

----------

Photo credit: Loro Parque

A study in Applied Animal Behaviour Science, authored by our very own Ricardo, investigated what husbandry & management practices were affecting mouse deer breeding & behaviour in European zoos:

✔Vegetation cover positively affected breeding, activity & natural behaviours;

✔Water ponds and enrichment also had positive effects on activity & natural behaviours;

✔Close proximity between males and females negatively impacted breeding;

✔Diet and temperature they are housed in is likely suboptimal and requires further research;

✔Mouse deer benefit from complex enclosures, with ample vegetation, natural features and opportunities to avoid conspecifics.

----------

Photo credit: Copenhagen Zoo

Research in  JZBG looked into the effects of construction work on the behaviour of zoo-housed lions:

✔During construction: increased pacing (male), decreased resting (all three lions);

✔Sound & ground vibrations more likely to have been the stressors;

✔No long-term effects - behavioural changes not detected one year later;

✔Mitigation measures suggested.

----------

Photo credit: Chester Zoo

A new study in JZAR looked into the activity budgets of zoo-housed Patagonian maras:

✔"Resting", "Feeding" & "Alert" were the most frequent behaviours;

✔High behavioural synchrony between mates;

✔Available data from wild individuals suggested a positive behavioural activity in these captive individuals.

----------

Photo credit: Hat.net

Noise at the zoo is a concern for animal welfare. Study in Zoo Biology assessed the soundscape (infrasounds and ultrasounds) of Zoo de Granby:

✔Sound levels increased during the day & with visitors present;

✔Sound levels generally not problematic for animal welfare;

✔Some locations showed high sound levels (e.g. indoor areas & touristic features);

✔Mitigation actions proposed.

A study investigated individual & synchronous breathing rate variations in three captive cetacean species:

✔Highest rates during energetic & social behaviours;

✔Higher rates during unusual events;

✔Enrichment: lower individual but higher synchronous rates;

✔Higher rates for ONE of the species in presence of public & during social separation;

✔Breathing rates are a useful parameter BUT should be interpreted carefully & integrated with other indicators.

----------

Photo credit: Baiji Dolphinarium

New study assessed the welfare improvements of the Asian elephants at ZSL Whipsnade Zoo, using data from their species-specific behavioural monitoring programme. Some of their findings include:
✔Species-appropriate levels of feeding;
✔Low levels of stereotypic behaviours;
✔Rare agonistic behaviour between group members;
✔Positive social associations & interactions between group members.

There is a new published paper on zoo husbandry practices in lechwe - a wetlands social antelope that is understudied in captivity:
✔Similar male:female ratios in captive and wild herds;
✔Enclosures usually included wetland areas, which were rarely managed;
✔Vegetation cover was limited;
✔Similar diets between zoos, but different from guidelines;
✔Abnormal behaviours reported but causes not identified.

----------

Photo credit: San Diego Zoo

The Five Domains Model of animal welfare assessment has just been updated in a new paper:
✔Five Domains: (1) Nutrition, (2) Physical Environment, (3) Health, (4) Behavioural Interactions, (5) Mental State;
✔Update adds human-animal interactions to the model;
✔Applicable to all animal caretakers, including zoo keepers, researchers & veterinary staff!

A new study has proposed a health & welfare assessment tool for the Giant Pacific octopus:

✔ Categories assessed: external appearance, behaviour & signs of stress and disease;

✔ Severity score system;

✔ Upward trend in score identified within 3-4 weeks of death - predictor?

----------

Photo credit: Aquarium of the Bay

New study investigated activity patterns in two zoo-housed grizzly bears:
✔Most inactivity recorded in winter;
✔Stereotypies and general activity emerged in spring and summer;
✔Stereotypies more frequent in the morning.